Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 08:51

Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
New ‘Dungeons & Dragons’ Single-Player Video Game in the Works - Variety
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
PGA Tour Announces Unfortunate News About Multiple Golfers During US Open - Athlon Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Le Mans 24 Hours: Kubica wins with Ferrari as Porsche spoils 1-2-3 - Autosport
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What Happens to Your Body When You Eat Watermelon Regularly - Verywell Health
Let’s just make it real clear:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What are some fun/kinky things to do with your partner?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Shock as Republican plan will raise Americans' utility bills by hundreds a year - Alternet
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.